Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadacultivar
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangorcultivar
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangebreeding_research_material
ClementineClementinebreeding_research_material
CleopatraCleopatracultivar
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1breeding_research_material
Fortune tangorFortune tangorcultivar
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarincultivar
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarincultivar
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorcultivar
MexicanMexicancultivar
Orah tangorOrah tangorcultivar
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limebreeding_research_material
PonkanPonkancultivar
Rangur limeRangur limecultivar
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarincultivar
Rough LemonRough Lemoncultivar
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarincultivar
summer orangesummer orangecultivar
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangebreeding_research_material
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumelocultivar
Tahiti limeTahiti limecultivar
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangecultivar
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
aurantium_14584_contig595_p333_CTaurantium_14584_contig595_p333_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig595_p542_GAaurantium_14584_contig595_p542_GAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig599_p1137_AGaurantium_14584_contig599_p1137_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig599_p1155_CTaurantium_14584_contig599_p1155_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig599_p116_CAaurantium_14584_contig599_p116_CAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig599_p192_GTaurantium_14584_contig599_p192_GTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig599_p329_TCaurantium_14584_contig599_p329_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig599_p433_TAaurantium_14584_contig599_p433_TAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig599_p70_CTaurantium_14584_contig599_p70_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig599_p822_CGaurantium_14584_contig599_p822_CGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig603_p665_AGaurantium_14584_contig603_p665_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig606_p126_TCaurantium_14584_contig606_p126_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig606_p217_CTaurantium_14584_contig606_p217_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig606_p292_CGaurantium_14584_contig606_p292_CGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig606_p310_TCaurantium_14584_contig606_p310_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig640_p258_TAaurantium_14584_contig640_p258_TAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig640_p308_CGaurantium_14584_contig640_p308_CGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig640_p372_CTaurantium_14584_contig640_p372_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig640_p474_CGaurantium_14584_contig640_p474_CGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig640_p506_GAaurantium_14584_contig640_p506_GAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig640_p57_AGaurantium_14584_contig640_p57_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig65_p1150_TCaurantium_14584_contig65_p1150_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig65_p389_TAaurantium_14584_contig65_p389_TAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig658_p130_ACaurantium_14584_contig658_p130_ACgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig658_p153_T-aurantium_14584_contig658_p153_T-genetic_marker

Pages

Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746