Madame Vinous Sweet Orange Multiple Pathogen-Infected cDNA Library UCRCS10-2

Overview
Library NameMadame Vinous Sweet Orange Multiple Pathogen-Infected cDNA Library UCRCS10-2
Unique NameMadame Vinous Sweet Orange Multiple Pathogen-Infected cDNA Library UCRCS10-2
OrganismCitrus sinensis (Sweet orange)
Typecdna_library
Vector: Lambda Uni-ZAP XR, excised phagemid; Site_1: EcoRI; Site_2: XhoI; Samples included bark, leaf and petiole from infected trees of Madame Vinous sweet orange. These trees were growing in pots in greenhouses at the USDA Citrus Repository (Nielsen), UC Riverside. The trees were infected with various pathogens. A total of 14 trees were sampled and pooled. Two trees each were infected with a different strain of Citrus psorosis virus, Citrus viroid IIb, Spiroplasma citri, or Citrus Dweet mottle virus, two trees were infected with a seedling yellows strain of Citrus tristeza virus, one tree was co-infected with Citrus concave gum virus plus Citrus exocortis viroid, and two trees were co-infected with Citrus tatter leaf virus and Citrus vein enation virus. Federici (Roose lab) collected the samples, after consulting with Lee, Krueger and Roose. Samples were collected from three or four young branches per tree. The bark had hardened but was still green and the diameter of the twig was less than approximately 5 mm. The tissue was not washed. The two trees infected with Vein enation/Tatterleaf had some mites on the leaves; the infestation was very light. These were wiped off before freezing the tissue, but mite material may have been included in the sample. Twenty young fully expanded leaf blades with the petioles removed were collected from each tree and placed together in one foil packet submerged in liquid nitrogen. The petioles from these leaves and another twenty from the same plant were frozen in another foil pack. Then the bark was pulled off the branches and chopped into pieces no longer than 3 cm and frozen together in a third packet. The bark from each plant was not weighed to equalize it, but the amounts appeared roughly equal. Mandal and Fenton(Close lab) purified RNA by a TRIzol method, pooled an equal quantity of RNA from each of the three samples, purified poly(A) mRNA using a PolyATtrack mRNA Isolation System IV (Promega), produced a primary cDNA library using a lambda ZAP XR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Stratagene), then mass-excised one million pfu from the primary library to produce a phagemid population. Phagemids were plated, plasmid DNA purified, cDNA clones archived, and DNA sequences determined bi-directionally using an ABI3730 at DNA Landmarks (Landry, Hubert, Laforest, Landry, Ligonde). Chromatogram files were downloaded by FTP to UC Riverside (by Close), then processed at UC Riverside (by Wanamaker, Close lab) using the HarvEST pipeline (http://harvest.ucr.edu) to remove vector and cloning oligo sequences and various contaminants, and to rim to a high quality region. Sequences that retained a phred 17 region of at least 100 bases were assembled, then chimeras were removed following manual inspection of assemblies (Close, Roose, Wanamaker). Sequences that survived all removal steps were submitted to GenBank.
Features
The following browser provides a quick view for new visitors. Use the searching mechanism to find specific features.
Feature NameUnique NameType
DT214551DT214551EST
DT214552DT214552EST
DT214553DT214553EST
DT214554DT214554EST
DT214555DT214555EST
DT214556DT214556EST
DT214557DT214557EST
DT214558DT214558EST
DT214559DT214559EST
DT214560DT214560EST
DT214561DT214561EST
DT214562DT214562EST
DT214563DT214563EST
DT214564DT214564EST
DT214565DT214565EST
DT214566DT214566EST
DT214567DT214567EST
DT214568DT214568EST
DT214569DT214569EST
DT214570DT214570EST
DT214571DT214571EST
DT214572DT214572EST
DT214573DT214573EST
DT214574DT214574EST
DT214575DT214575EST

Pages

Properties
Property NameValue
Genbank library cultivarMadame Vinous
Genbank library dev stageTrees in pots
Genbank library noteVector: Lambda Uni-ZAP XR, excised phagemid; Site_1: EcoRI; Site_2: XhoI; Samples included bark, leaf and petiole from infected trees of Madame Vinous sweet orange. These trees were growing in pots in greenhouses at the USDA Citrus Repository (Nielsen), UC Riverside. The trees were infected with various pathogens. A total of 14 trees were sampled and pooled. Two trees each were infected with a different strain of Citrus psorosis virus, Citrus viroid IIb, Spiroplasma citri, or Citrus Dweet mottle virus, two trees were infected with a seedling yellows strain of Citrus tristeza virus, one tree was co-infected with Citrus concave gum virus plus Citrus exocortis viroid, and two trees were co-infected with Citrus tatter leaf virus and Citrus vein enation virus. Federici (Roose lab) collected the samples, after consulting with Lee, Krueger and Roose. Samples were collected from three or four young branches per tree. The bark had hardened but was still green and the diameter of the twig was less than approximately 5 mm. The tissue was not washed. The two trees infected with Vein enation/Tatterleaf had some mites on the leaves; the infestation was very light. These were wiped off before freezing the tissue, but mite material may have been included in the sample. Twenty young fully expanded leaf blades with the petioles removed were collected from each tree and placed together in one foil packet submerged in liquid nitrogen. The petioles from these leaves and another twenty from the same plant were frozen in another foil pack. Then the bark was pulled off the branches and chopped into pieces no longer than 3 cm and frozen together in a third packet. The bark from each plant was not weighed to equalize it, but the amounts appeared roughly equal. Mandal and Fenton(Close lab) purified RNA by a TRIzol method, pooled an equal quantity of RNA from each of the three samples, purified poly(A) mRNA using a PolyATtrack mRNA Isolation System IV (Promega), produced a primary cDNA library using a lambda ZAP XR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Stratagene), then mass-excised one million pfu from the primary library to produce a phagemid population. Phagemids were plated, plasmid DNA purified, cDNA clones archived, and DNA sequences determined bi-directionally using an ABI3730 at DNA Landmarks (Landry, Hubert, Laforest, Landry, Ligonde). Chromatogram files were downloaded by FTP to UC Riverside (by Close), then processed at UC Riverside (by Wanamaker, Close lab) using the HarvEST pipeline (http://harvest.ucr.edu) to remove vector and cloning oligo sequences and various contaminants, and to rim to a high quality region. Sequences that retained a phred 17 region of at least 100 bases were assembled, then chimeras were removed following manual inspection of assemblies (Close, Roose, Wanamaker). Sequences that survived all removal steps were submitted to GenBank.
Genbank library tissue typeLeaf, petiole, bark
Leaftissue type