Madame Vinous Sweet Orange Multiple Pathogen-Infected cDNA Library UCRCS10

Overview
Library NameMadame Vinous Sweet Orange Multiple Pathogen-Infected cDNA Library UCRCS10
Unique NameMadame Vinous Sweet Orange Multiple Pathogen-Infected cDNA Library UCRCS10
OrganismCitrus sinensis (Sweet orange)
Typecdna_library
Vector: Lambda Uni-ZAP XR, excised phagemidV_TYPE: Phagemid pBluescript SK(-); Site_1: EcoRI; Site_2: XhoI; Samples included bark, leaf and petiole from infected trees of Madame Vinous sweet orange. These trees were growing in pots in greenhouses at the USDA Citrus Repository (Nielsen), UC Riverside. The trees were infected with various pathogens. A total of 14 trees were sampled and pooled. Two trees each were infected with a different strain of Citrus psorosis virus, Citrus viroid IIb, Spiroplasma citri, or Citrus Dweet mottle virus, two trees were infected with a seedling yellows strain of Citrus tristeza virus, one tree was co-infected with Citrus concave gum virus plus Citrus exocortis viroid, and two trees were co-infected with Citrus tatter leaf virus and Citrus vein enation virus. Federici (Roose lab) collected the samples, after consulting with Lee, Krueger and Roose. Samples were collected from three or four young branches per tree. The bark had hardened but was still green and the diameter of the twig was less than approximately 5 mm. The tissue was not washed. The two trees infected with Vein enation/Tatterleaf had some mites on the leaves; the infestation was very light. These were wiped off before freezing the tissue, but mite material may have been included in the sample. Twenty young fully expanded leaf blades with the petioles removed were collected from each tree and placed together in one foil packet submerged in liquid nitrogen. The petioles from these leaves and another twenty from the same plant were frozen in another foil pack. Then the bark was pulled off the branches and chopped into pieces no longer than 3 cm and frozen together in a third packet. The bark from each plant was not weighed to equalize it, but the amounts appeared roughly equal. Mandal and Fenton(Close lab) purified RNA by a TRIzol method, pooled an equal quantity of RNA from each of the three samples, purified poly(A) mRNA using a PolyATtrack mRNA Isolation System IV (Promega), produced a primary cDNA library using a lambda ZAP XR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Stratagene), then mass-excised one million pfu from the primary library to produce a phagemid population. Phagemids were plated, plasmid DNA purified, cDNA clones archived, and DNA sequences determined bi-directionally using an ABI3730 at DNA Landmarks (Landry, Hubert, Laforest, Landry, Ligonde). Chromatogram files were downloaded by FTP to UC Riverside (by Close), then processed at UC Riverside (by Wanamaker, Close lab) using the HarvEST pipeline (http://harvest.ucr.edu) to remove vector and cloning oligo sequences and various contaminants, and to trim to a high quality region. Sequences that retained a phred 17 region of at least 100 bases were assembled, then chimeras were removed following manual inspection of assemblies (Close, Roose, Wanamaker). Sequences that survived all removal steps were submitted to GenBank.
Features
The following browser provides a quick view for new visitors. Use the searching mechanism to find specific features.
Feature NameUnique NameType
CX671612CX671612EST
CX671613CX671613EST
CX671614CX671614EST
CX671615CX671615EST
CX671616CX671616EST
CX671617CX671617EST
CX671618CX671618EST
CX671619CX671619EST
CX671620CX671620EST
CX671621CX671621EST
CX671622CX671622EST
CX671623CX671623EST
CX671624CX671624EST
CX671625CX671625EST
CX671626CX671626EST
CX671627CX671627EST
CX671628CX671628EST
CX671629CX671629EST
CX671630CX671630EST
CX671631CX671631EST
CX671632CX671632EST
CX671633CX671633EST
CX671634CX671634EST
CX671635CX671635EST
CX671636CX671636EST

Pages

Properties
Property NameValue
Genbank library cultivarMadame Vinous
Genbank library dev stageTrees in pots
Genbank library noteVector: Lambda Uni-ZAP XR, excised phagemidV_TYPE: Phagemid pBluescript SK(-); Site_1: EcoRI; Site_2: XhoI; Samples included bark, leaf and petiole from infected trees of Madame Vinous sweet orange. These trees were growing in pots in greenhouses at the USDA Citrus Repository (Nielsen), UC Riverside. The trees were infected with various pathogens. A total of 14 trees were sampled and pooled. Two trees each were infected with a different strain of Citrus psorosis virus, Citrus viroid IIb, Spiroplasma citri, or Citrus Dweet mottle virus, two trees were infected with a seedling yellows strain of Citrus tristeza virus, one tree was co-infected with Citrus concave gum virus plus Citrus exocortis viroid, and two trees were co-infected with Citrus tatter leaf virus and Citrus vein enation virus. Federici (Roose lab) collected the samples, after consulting with Lee, Krueger and Roose. Samples were collected from three or four young branches per tree. The bark had hardened but was still green and the diameter of the twig was less than approximately 5 mm. The tissue was not washed. The two trees infected with Vein enation/Tatterleaf had some mites on the leaves; the infestation was very light. These were wiped off before freezing the tissue, but mite material may have been included in the sample. Twenty young fully expanded leaf blades with the petioles removed were collected from each tree and placed together in one foil packet submerged in liquid nitrogen. The petioles from these leaves and another twenty from the same plant were frozen in another foil pack. Then the bark was pulled off the branches and chopped into pieces no longer than 3 cm and frozen together in a third packet. The bark from each plant was not weighed to equalize it, but the amounts appeared roughly equal. Mandal and Fenton(Close lab) purified RNA by a TRIzol method, pooled an equal quantity of RNA from each of the three samples, purified poly(A) mRNA using a PolyATtrack mRNA Isolation System IV (Promega), produced a primary cDNA library using a lambda ZAP XR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Stratagene), then mass-excised one million pfu from the primary library to produce a phagemid population. Phagemids were plated, plasmid DNA purified, cDNA clones archived, and DNA sequences determined bi-directionally using an ABI3730 at DNA Landmarks (Landry, Hubert, Laforest, Landry, Ligonde). Chromatogram files were downloaded by FTP to UC Riverside (by Close), then processed at UC Riverside (by Wanamaker, Close lab) using the HarvEST pipeline (http://harvest.ucr.edu) to remove vector and cloning oligo sequences and various contaminants, and to trim to a high quality region. Sequences that retained a phred 17 region of at least 100 bases were assembled, then chimeras were removed following manual inspection of assemblies (Close, Roose, Wanamaker). Sequences that survived all removal steps were submitted to GenBank.
Genbank library tissue typeLeaf, petiole, bark
Leaftissue type