Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadacultivar
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangorcultivar
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangebreeding_research_material
ClementineClementinebreeding_research_material
CleopatraCleopatracultivar
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1breeding_research_material
Fortune tangorFortune tangorcultivar
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarincultivar
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarincultivar
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorcultivar
MexicanMexicancultivar
Orah tangorOrah tangorcultivar
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limebreeding_research_material
PonkanPonkancultivar
Rangur limeRangur limecultivar
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarincultivar
Rough LemonRough Lemoncultivar
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarincultivar
summer orangesummer orangecultivar
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangebreeding_research_material
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumelocultivar
Tahiti limeTahiti limecultivar
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangecultivar
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
aurantium_14584_contig853_p54_CTaurantium_14584_contig853_p54_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig855_p248_GAaurantium_14584_contig855_p248_GAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig855_p429_GTaurantium_14584_contig855_p429_GTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig855_p445_C-aurantium_14584_contig855_p445_C-genetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig86_p119_TAaurantium_14584_contig86_p119_TAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig86_p1192_ACaurantium_14584_contig86_p1192_ACgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig86_p1428_TAaurantium_14584_contig86_p1428_TAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig86_p1591_CTaurantium_14584_contig86_p1591_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig86_p1698_ACaurantium_14584_contig86_p1698_ACgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig86_p1737_TGaurantium_14584_contig86_p1737_TGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig86_p319_TCaurantium_14584_contig86_p319_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig86_p343_GTaurantium_14584_contig86_p343_GTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig86_p418_TGaurantium_14584_contig86_p418_TGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig86_p59_CGaurantium_14584_contig86_p59_CGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig9_p117_GAaurantium_14584_contig9_p117_GAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig9_p237_TCaurantium_14584_contig9_p237_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig9_p264_ACaurantium_14584_contig9_p264_ACgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig9_p333_GAaurantium_14584_contig9_p333_GAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig9_p390_AGaurantium_14584_contig9_p390_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig9_p552_TCaurantium_14584_contig9_p552_TCgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig9_p64_AGaurantium_14584_contig9_p64_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig908_p193_GAaurantium_14584_contig908_p193_GAgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig908_p308_CTaurantium_14584_contig908_p308_CTgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig908_p354_AGaurantium_14584_contig908_p354_AGgenetic_marker
aurantium_14584_contig908_p389_GAaurantium_14584_contig908_p389_GAgenetic_marker

Pages

Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746